Search for: "B. Cooley" Results 1 - 20 of 287
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2018, 2:44 pm by David Frakt
 How else to explain the ABA's decision to find Cooley back in compliance with Standard 501(b)? [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 3:36 pm by David Frakt
The ABA’s March decision to find WMU Thomas Cooley School of Law back in compliance with Standard 501(b) was puzzling, given the fact that Cooley has been America’s least selective law school for the last three years. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 2:13 pm by David Frakt
  Eventually, the ABA decided it could ignore Cooley’s flagrant disregard of Standard 501(b) no longer. [read post]
25 May 2018, 9:12 am by David Frakt
As the brief notes: The November 2017 Letter concluded that WMU-Cooley was out of compliance with 501(b). [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 7:57 am by David Frakt
 But this argument ignores the fact that Cooley was placed on notice in 2017 that their admissions standards were too low, when they were found out of compliance with ABA Standard 501(b), after I and others had repeatedly called for action against Cooley. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:05 am
Kimball, Esq., Cooley Godward Kronish LLP, for the protester. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 12:08 pm by David Frakt
    If the ABA has decided that schools must have a median LSAT of 145 or higher to comply with 501(b), then I agree with Cooley that the ABA should come right out and say so. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 7:30 pm by Matt Bartus
Average valuations for Series A, B and D+ rounds reached levels not seen in the last eight years. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 2:26 pm by scanner1
COOLEY, DANIEL COOLEY, BRIAN COOLEY, DARREN COOLEY, CALLIE RECH, d/b/a COOLEY RANCH, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 7:57 am by David Frakt
 But this argument ignores the fact that Cooley was placed on notice in 2017 that their admissions standards were too low, when they were found out of compliance with ABA Standard 501(b), after I and others had repeatedly called for action against Cooley. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm by David Frakt
  Whatever sanctions the ABA chooses to impose will be richly deserved, but I hope that the Committee will seriously consider the authorized sanction under Rule 16(b)(2) of “requiring that the law school refund all or part of tuition or fees paid by students” for those students that the ABA determines never should have been admitted. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 4:30 am by Frances Zacher
On July 20, 2012, the Michigan federal court where the case was pending dismissed it after the law school filed a 12(b)(6) motion. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:36 pm by David Frakt
(b) A law school shall admit only applicants who appear capable of satisfactorily completing its program of legal education and being admitted to the bar. [read post]